Flexibility comes with risks
Wong Wei Kong
THE first set of proposals by the CPF Advisory Panel to revamp Singapore's retirement system, with its accent on flexibility and individual choice, has been generally welcome. But there are some questions to think about too.
A key one is the part property plays in terms of retirement adequacy. The recommendations will allow those owning property and have a CPF charge on the property to withdraw, at 55, savings in excess of the proposed Basic Retirement Sum of S$80,500, while those without would have to meet the Full Retirement Sum of S$161,000.
This was presented as a "reframing" of current requirements. Currently, there is a minimum sum requirement of S$161,000, which will be used to pay for the CPF Life annuity scheme. However, whether they have enough to meet the minimum sum requirement or not, people can choose to pledge their property for up to S$80,500. The excess cash can then be withdrawn. The property pledge, in some ways, was commonly seen as a concession. Ideally, people should be leaving S$161,000 in the system to fund their retirement payouts.
TRENDING NOW
Abandoned ‘Titanic’, failing ‘ancient towns’: Why China’s tourism boom leaves white elephants behind
SpaceX surge further boosts Saudi billionaire prince’s fortune
Battle for Asia’s ultra-rich: ‘Singapore can’t afford to keep losing clients to Dubai, Hong Kong’
Billionaire Partners Group founder moves to split family office