夫妇因“99-1”房产交易中的失实陈述起诉ERA、其经纪人及律师事务所,索赔731,212新元
起诉人因在购买公寓时非法规避印花税,寻求追回因此被征收的额外税款和附加费
DeeperDive is a beta AI feature. Refer to full articles for the facts.
本文由AI辅助翻译
[新加坡] 一对已婚夫妇因一宗失败的“99-1”房产交易,以疏忽失实陈述和违反职责为由,起诉ERA Realty、其一名经纪人及一家律师事务所,索赔731,212新元。
买家Samuel Soh和Ken Tan就2022年12月的一项“99-1”交易起诉了这三方,寻求追回731,212新元的赔偿金。这笔款项是税务当局因认定其购买公寓的行为属非法规避印花税而征收的额外税款和附加费。
这是过去一年来一系列购房者起诉房地产经纪公司、其经纪人及律师事务所的诉讼中的最新一起。针对PropNex的类似诉讼也已出现。
Decoding Asia newsletter: your guide to navigating Asia in a new global order. Sign up here to get Decoding Asia newsletter. Delivered to your inbox. Free.
Copyright SPH Media. All rights reserved.
TRENDING NOW
Air India asks Tata, Singapore Airlines for funds after US$2.4 billion loss
‘Boring’ is the new black: The stars are aligning for a Singapore stock market revival
From 1MDB to ‘corporate mafia’: Is Malaysia facing a new governance test?
South-east Asian markets account for 8.8% of global capital inflows from 2021 to 2024: report